●   Bản rời    

Dân North Carolina chống đại biểu Cộng Hòa Madison Cawthorn ra tái ứng cử

From NTH on 2022-01-27 14:59

Một nhóm dân North Carolina đã đệ đơn thách thức pháp lý, chống đại biểu Cộng Hòa Hạ viện Madison Cawthorn ra tái ứng cử kỳ 2022, dựa trên cơ sở Tu chính Hiến pháp số 14, do nghi ngờ tên này có dính líu đến cuộc nổi loạn ngày 6/1/21 tại Tòa Capitol của Quốc Hội.

Để xem, luật pháp Mỹ có xử lý tên này hay không, để bảo vệ hệ thống và thể chế "dân chủ" đang bị coi thường bởi D. Trump và lũ tà phái côn đồ đầu trâu mặt ngựa

nth

___________________________________
North Carolina Voters Challenge Rep. Madison Cawthorn's Candidacy for Reelection Under Fourteenth Amendment's Insurrectionist Disqualification Clause - Free Speech For People

First Such Challenge to Candidate Eligibility Filed Since the Reconstruction Era

"listen to our dear leader" :
"fight like hell or you won't have your country any more"



RALEIGH, NC – A group of North Carolina voters has filed a legal challenge to U.S. Representative Madison Cawthorn's 2022 candidacy. The challenge, filed before the North Carolina State Board of Elections, alleges that Cawthorn is constitutionally disqualified from public office under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution based on reasonable suspicion that he helped facilitate the January 6, 2021 insurrection. The voters are represented by Free Speech For People, a nonpartisan, non-profit legal advocacy organization with constitutional law expertise, which is serving as lead counsel in the matter; Wallace & Nordan, a North Carolina law firm specializing in election law; and Robert F. Orr, a former Republican Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court. James G. Exum, Jr., a former Chief Justice of the North Carolina Supreme Court, serves as Of Counsel in the matter.

Section Three of the Fourteenth Amendment, known as the Disqualification Clause, provides: "No Person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress. . . who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress . . . to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof." The purpose of the Disqualification Clause, passed in the wake of the Civil War, is not to punish the oathbreaker but rather to protect the country. No criminal conviction or prior adjudication is required under the Disqualification Clause, although Cawthorn would be able to seek judicial review of an adverse decision.

"The coordinated and violent January 6 attack on the United States Capitol in an effort to prevent Congress from certifying the presidential vote was an insurrection against the United States. The Constitution disqualifies from public office any elected officials who aided that insurrection," said Ron Fein, Legal Director of Free Speech For People. "As set forth in our complaint, the publicly available evidence, including Representative Cawthorn's own statements and reports that he or his office coordinated with the January 6 organizers, establish reasonable suspicion that Representative Cawthorn aided the insurrection, thereby disqualifying him from federal office. We look forward to asking him about his involvement under oath."

Under North Carolina's candidacy challenge statute, any registered voter in his district may challenge his candidacy based on "reasonable suspicion or belief" that he "does not meet the constitutional or statutory qualifications for the office." Once a challenge is filed, the burden of proof shifts to the candidate, who "must show by a preponderance of the evidence . . . that he or she is qualified to be a candidate for the office." The statute authorizes "depositions prior to the hearing, if requested by the challenger," and "subpoenas for witnesses or documents . . . including a subpoena of the candidate." The challengers intend to depose Cawthorn and members of his staff—something that the U.S. House January 6 Select Committee has not yet done.

---